Presently Admin. of Kinfo are providing "daily quote" from early writings, I have few suggestions on this matter:

1. Quote from late teachings and early teachings may be provided on alternative basis., i.e one day from early period and next day from late period.

2.Or quote should be selected from anywhere on the basis of current topics of discussions, without being focused on particular chronology.

....

I don't know

This post was last updated by dhirendra singh Fri, 10 Feb 2012.

Good idea D.

And it seems you have a 'shadow'.

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
And it seems you have a 'shadow'.

Thanks!

Will the real D be stand up..LOL:)Ghost writing is making a come back right here yeah...!:)

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
And it seems you have a 'shadow'

RICK LEIN wrote:
Thanks!
Will the real D be stand up..LOL:)Ghost writing is making a come back right here yeah...!:)

Why do Patricia and Rick want to know who is posting under the name of Dhirendra Silent?

Either you are frustrated because you cannot put an image under this "shadow, ghost" or you may imagine that he could be Nick, or Lidlo or Paul.....

Both of you are lost, you didn't even dare post a reply to the topic created by Dhirendra Silent, since you could not figure out an image made to post to........... And you talk about image making..... ?

Nobody asked who is D Silent, Why you?

Why not? It's a free forum.

A more valid question may be: Why the need for hiding behind various disguises? I don't care - but it is very curious - this need to be here 'incognito'.

Perhaps you could answer that one. :)

Seems to be the only person you hide from is yourself. lol

This post was last updated by Patricia Hemingway Sat, 11 Feb 2012.

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
Good idea D.

Thank you M'm.:)

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
And it seems you have a 'shadow'.

;), Probably only discussion matters, not the name of person.

I don't know

RICK LEIN wrote:
Will the real D be stand up..LOL:)Ghost writing is making a come back right here yeah...!:)

My dearest friend, is not this a way we always make an issue of non-issue?Poster's name? I don't know how it make any difference to postings.

I don't know

K. Kennedy wrote:
you didn't even dare post a reply to the topic created by Dhirendra Silent, since you could not figure out an image made to post to.....

Yes, I think if there is any thing to do, it's to address to the topic.

I don't know

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
but it is very curious - this need to be here 'incognito

If you visit official site of K foundation, kfa, there most of poster's have pseudo names, and there it is not an issue at all.

But I understand curiosity, I think sooner we will be able to recognize him by style of postings of D silent.;)

I don't know

dhirendra singh wrote:
But I understand curiosity, I think sooner we will be able to recognize him by style of postings of D silent.;)

mixture of styles:)
gb

We are watching, not waiting, not expecting anything to happen but watching without end. JK

GB, Will you also like to say something about topic? Or it doesn't suit to your style?;)

I don't know

This post was last updated by dhirendra singh Sat, 11 Feb 2012.

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
Perhaps you could answer that one. :)

Yes ma'm, willingly :)

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
A more valid question may be: Why the need for hiding behind various disguises? I don't care - but it is very curious - this need to be here 'incognito'.

You : as Patricia Hemingway a Musician female of 70 years old, living in Australia are already hiding behind various disguises and you know that. In fact what is in bold caracters is your disguise. Can you see that?

What makes you unconcealed or known is definetely not your identity, nor your name. Your identity (story) may be useful for your Police Department in Australia, in order to know -For example- how many times have you driven under alcohool positive tets check? Or have you paid your taxes... etc....

In this Forum, I can call myself JFK, the next day I might be Marilyn Monroe, another day I may take the name of Adolf Hitler.... What really matters as Dhirendra already said is what I am exchanging here, what I am communicating here....

You have already stated; you Patricia Hemingway in various previous posts that the speaker, the poster, is not important. What is important is what have been said. True? false? to discuss.....

Now, just for fun : Imagine K under a tent of 2 or 3 thousands attendants. The day gathering is a question / answer meeting. Every time one person of the audience wants to ask a question. K asks what's your name? age? Where are you from? Are you single/married, Musician or clerck, Jewish or Buddhist?

That would be really curious/funny/strange NO? No?

We are all incognito here Patricia. And it is fine this way....

Yourself is not your Identity. Oh!!! NO.......

How nice of you to be so concerned about identity.

K. Kennedy wrote:
What really matters as Dhirendra already said is what I am exchanging here, what I am communicating here....

LOL..same old same old...tisk tisk tisk.

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

K. Kennedy wrote:
We are all incognito here Patricia. And it is fine this way....

Your not really addressing the question now are you?I was miserable when you had gone Chafia...it was almost as bad as actually having you here!I really kind of missed your convoluted twist of illogic..and scapegoating! :)

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
How nice of you to be so concerned about identity.

Well she has at least 3..I would be concerned as well...LOL:)

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

K. Kennedy wrote:
Either you are frustrated because you cannot put an image under this "shadow, ghost" or you may imagine that he could be Nick, or Lidlo or Paul.....

Being rather assumptive are we not...O.M.? Perhaps you may be projecting your own insecurities here? What difference does it make for you Chafia?

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

K. Kennedy wrote:
What makes you unconcealed or known is definetely not your identity, nor your name.

No it is the content of your mind..through your postings..now please go get dressed!:)

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

RICK LEIN wrote:
Being rather assumptive are we not...O.M.?

No We are not. Correction Dear Rick, You are assuptive. I know who Diherendra Silent is, but I am not telling you. Because :

RICK LEIN wrote:
What difference does it make for you

None, and for you?

RICK LEIN wrote:
No it is the content of your mind..through your postings..now please go get dressed!:)

Thaaannk You!!! That's what I've always said.

You mean undressed/naked, I suppose!! No?

I just want to say a last thing : Just let go and BE in Peace Rick.

This post was last updated by K. Kennedy (account deleted) Sun, 12 Feb 2012.

K. Kennedy wrote:
I know who Diherendra Silent is, but I am not telling you. Because

You need not..they are already as known as you are Chafia...LOL:)

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

K. Kennedy wrote:
I just want to say a last thing

Promise sweet thing?:)

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

K. Kennedy wrote:
I know who Diherendra Silent is, but I am not telling you. Because :

Oh - how important your inside knowledge makes YOU!

Patricia Hemingway wrote:
Oh - how important your inside knowledge makes YOU!

LOL..yes..I've gotta a secret..nah nee..nah..nee poo..poo.:) junior high school hide and seek anyone...

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

K. Kennedy wrote:
Both of you are lost, you didn't even dare post a reply to the topic created by Dhirendra Silent, since

Dare..or care sweet thing...Thing is as was already stated the content of your postings are a dead giveaway..no matter what outward form[image] you try and hide behind...You my dear are not as clever as you believe you are!:)

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE

Dear Dhirendra (Singh), maybe you could say why you would like this change in the quote of the day. You have said what you want but not why.

Do you find a qualitative difference between the earlier and the later talks? Or is there some other reason?

Personally I feel that since all the later K talks are either on DVD or accessible in various books, it does a service to quote from the earlier talks since the interested reader will go to the source and find something they may have been unaware of.

But please explain your reasons. It is an interesting proposition that could be debated.

I am perhaps one of the valiant ones who responded seriously to the Silent One but for my interest I got back silly responses so I gave up. It is not the names of people that I care about but the quality of the interactions. There is a childish aggressiveness to the ping-pong matches we get entrenched in which seems rather wasteful of the possibilities here. I include myself.

dhirendra singh wrote:
GB, Will you also like to say something about topic;)

any quote from K will do.
gb

We are watching, not waiting, not expecting anything to happen but watching without end. JK

Peng Shu Tse wrote:
maybe you could say why you would like this change in the quote of the day. You have said what you want but not why.

In his late writings there is a little change in his language, so by providing quote from different periods, express his teaching better.

Or by choosing quote according to current discussion, make it relevant.

I don't know

Peng Shu Tse wrote:
I am perhaps one of the valiant ones who responded seriously to the Silent One but for my interest I got back silly responses so I gave up

If possible, can you tell us how it was a silly response, in that thread.

I don't know