You can shorten the path totally anguish, uncertainty about the search for truth. And it is your choice. Namely, someone says to you: in this case, Phill, that he actually sees it, without conflict, clear, without a hint of disappointment. He meets you and tells you this. And now the choice is yours: do you believe him or not. It is based on faith, trust that this one does not come and trap sprung on you, worship their own that you admired him, etc. He says it's like for information, it is only transmitter. If you believe him to treat him as a soulless, electromagnetic relay. No content is not his. And now if he believed that he was from there that he comes to you says: easily and quickly reaches it a slut (sorry to be a little harsh word, but it is on a year of contrast) than the Pharisee. Slut has a problem just emotions, a Pharisee has a problem with the ideas for which it is attached. Enlightenment, knowing the truth lies in knowing untruth. Slut meets this untruth at any time in contact with it, well he sees the consequences of the proceedings, she does not flee from them. The Pharisee is trying to find the truth by comparing ideas, and every idea, invention, thought is untrue. Circle is closed. The Pharisee never discover that the thought is false, because already at the source, at the very beginning of thought takes it as a good thing. Closed for ever in his own cage, which he has created and you will never open. If he believed in it all, let this be your mantra at times attempt to "search" truth: more easily and quickly reaches it a slut than a Pharisee. At the same time if you have a question that you are pleased to choose, I recommend that a more "pleasant". The point is that the less you try to live "morally" and more going through the pleasure you get the sooner you understand that pleasure false. It will be for you unbearably empty, idiotic, and finally completely indifferent. It's not about to search a new pleasure, which you seem to be because it's such a search experience by the mind. You examine the cage, which already are, which previously entered, you do not want to close yourself in new cages. Enough works with your existing cages.
Only one reservation. If the pleasure of doing harm to another, ie according to your discernment that the latter "does not want"; and you know it (and I mean pain, suffering resulting from "wanting" the other person's psychological expectations towards you, just that the other person feels itself very threatened, or even suffer through it physically), it is not the way to discover the truth, because truth can not cause suffering and does not impose a - here you need to rely on your prudence, conscience. Also, if in "experiencing" pleasure You doing a break to enjoy the pleasures of less intense and the like, and do it in order to prolong the pleasure that is already anticipate that its intensity, decreases, and deprives the picture of her emptiness; and doing it all in a way that is completely unconstrained by your assessment you do not feel any pressure You pull the moral guilt to truth, not looking for it, you avoid the real picture.

This post was last updated by Phill Romancatholic Thu, 02 Feb 2012.