Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

J. Krishnamurti | A Dialogue with Oneself

Now the problem is: can thought realize that whatever it does is limited, fragmented and therefore isolating and that whatever it does will be thus? This is a very important point: can thought itself realize its own limitations? Or am I telling it that it is limited? This, I see, is very important to understand; this is the real essence of the matter. If thought realizes itself that it is limited then there is no resistance, no conflict; it says, ``I am that''. But if I am telling it that it is limited then I become separate from the limitation. Then I struggle to overcome the limitation, therefore there is conflict and violence, not love.

So does thought realize of itself that it is limited? I have to find out. I am being challenged. Because I am challenged I have great energy. Put it differently: does consciousness realize its content is itself? Or is it that I have heard another say: ``Consciousness is its content; its content makes up consciousness''? Therefore I say, ``Yes, it is so''. Do you see the difference between the two? The latter, created by thought, is imposed by the `me'. If I impose something on thought then there is conflict. It is like a tyrannical government imposing on someone, but here that government is what I have created.

So I am asking myself: has thought realized its own limitations? Or is it pretending to be something extraordinary, noble, divine? - which is nonsense because thought is based on memory. I see that there must be clarity about this point: that there is no outside influence imposing on thought saying it is limited. Then, because there is no imposition there is no conflict; it simply realizes it is limited; it realizes that whatever it does - its worship of god and so on - is limited, shoddy, petty - even though it has created marvellous cathedrals throughout Europe in which to worship.

Tags: isolation, loneliness

Related Quotes
How can that essence of resistance, which is the me, how can that be completely `let go'?
It is only the righteous man that develops his will as a means of resistance, and a man of will can never find truth, because he is never free.
To go beyond the self-enclosing activities of the mind, you must understand them;
We are related to someone only as long as that relationship gratifies us, as long as it gives us a refuge, as long as it satisfies us.
There is a strange despair in anger; for isolation is despair.
Any process that leads to limitation, to resistance, to cutting oneself off, as it were, in an intellectual or an ideal state, is destructive of creative living.
Is not all existence a question of relationship?
Not finding satisfaction in human relationship we often try to establish it in the realm of theories, beliefs, concepts.
Without fully understanding the process of greed, merely to cultivate kindliness, generosity, is to perpetuate ignorance and cruelty; without integrally understanding relationship, merely to cultivate compassion, forgiveness, is to bring about self-isolation and to indulge in subtle forms of pride.
There can never be self-isolation, however much one may crave for it; relationship is ever continuous; to be is to be related.
Questioner: I am already an introvert and it seems to me that from what you have been saying, is there not a danger of my becoming more and more self-centred, more of an introvert?
The relationship of two people creates society; society is not independent of you and me;
The wall you build around yourself psychologically consists of the values you give to things made either by the hand or by the mind, i.e. of your ideation.
The walls which you protect yourself with are built up of the value which you yourself have given to things.
Are you aware that you are creating this wall of detachment around you?
Desire is the builder of the wall - desire for title, for bank account, for property, for family, for beliefs.
In your present state of psychological enclosure behind the wall of your sensate values, your talk of brotherhood has no meaning whatsoever.
You cannot withdraw from the world, to withdraw means isolation and you cannot live in isolation.
The fundamental issue really is whether human beings can exist in identified isolation;
To be, is to be related;
A controlled mind is not a free mind.
What is isolation? Are you not now isolated in your relationship with your wife, etc.? Do you know them? Is this not creating the mess in the world?
What a strange thing is loneliness, and how frightening it is! We never allow ourselves to get too close to it; and if by chance we do, we quickly run away from it.
Loneliness is the awareness of complete isolation; and are not our activities self-enclosing?
Can the mind live, be vital, energetic, full of depth, without attachment? Of course it can.
When there is no naming, only then is it possible to be fully aware of that which is called the void of loneliness.
Feeling lonely, we attach ourselves to people, drink, and all sorts of other escapes. Attachment is an escape from loneliness.
You cannot accept my word for it: all you can say is that you do not know.
Question: What should one do to get rid of loneliness and fear?
Any process that leads to limitation, to resistance, to cutting oneself off, as it were, in an intellectual or an ideal state, is destructive of creative living.
There is only one fundamental problem, which expresses itself in many different ways.
Whether we are conscious of it or not, most of us are lonely; the more we are aware of it the more intense, burning and painful it becomes.
To find the right and lasting answer to loneliness we must first cease to run away from it, and this is very difficult for thought is ever seeking a refuge, an escape.
The walls which you protect yourself with are built up of the value which you yourself have given to things.
Desire is the builder of the wall - desire for title, for bank account, for property, for family, for beliefs.
In your present state of psychological enclosure behind the wall of your sensate values, your talk of brotherhood has no meaning whatsoever.