Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Talks in Europe, 1967 | 5th Public Talk Paris 30th April 1967

Questioner: Would you go a little more into what you mean when you say that we should doubt our experience?

Krishnamurti: What is an experience, Sir? When you are responding to a challenge - any challenge, whether it is small or great - if the response is not adequate, complete, then there is conflict. This conflict, whether it is pleasurable or painful, is part of the experience. When you experience anything, be it a response to a political speech or whatever it is, it is either partial or total - and if total the response is comparable to the challenge. Every challenge is new - or it is not a challenge - and if you respond according to your background then the experience is in terms of the old, there is no experience at all.

For most of us, experience is the stimulus that keeps us awake. If we had no challenges at all we would be fast asleep - we would become very dull. There are vast technological changes in the world, and to these our psychological response is inadequate - hence the conflict.

Experience, as we have it, is a process of recognition of what has been. You cannot recognize a new experience - it is impossible. You only recognize something which you have already known; therefore when you say I have a new experience, it is not new at all.

One has to understand this process of recognition, which is the memory, which is the past - the past is responding all the time. We are the past, we are the bundle of memories, and it is that that is responding all the time - demanding more and more experience. And, as I said, if we did not have challenges, we would go to sleep; on these we depend to keep us awake. The more intelligent one becomes, the more one tends to reject the challenge; then one creates one's own challenge, asking, doubting, questioning, denying, but in that there is still the process of recognition, hence conflict.

Can the mind keep awake without the stimulus of experience? - implying a great sensitivity, both physically and psychologically, a great capacity and vulnerability. Such a mind does not demand experience, it is not seeking experience. it is its own light; it does not need a challenge, or know a challenge; it does not say, I am asleep or not asleep; it is completely what it is. It is only the frustrated, narrow, shallow mind, the conditioned mind, that is always seeking the more. Is it possible to live a life in this world without the more - without this everlasting comparison? - surely it is. That, one has to find out for oneself.

Tags: experience, recogition

Related Quotes
We must find out - if it is possible or not - whether there is a different dimension, a different approach, to life altogether.
Your experiences, your inclinations and motives, all that is the movement of the past, which is knowledge.
All one's education, all one's past experience and knowledge is a movement in becoming, both inwardly, psychologically as well as outwardly.
You have only one head, care for it, don't destroy it. It's so easy to poison it.
The more you are interested in something, the more your intention to understand, the more simple, clear, free the mind is.
If I listen to what you are saying - which may perhaps be new, different - with a mind already entrenched in a particular ideology, in a particular experience, in a specific knowledge, can such a mind listen?
To examine, explore, anything, there must be the quality of freedom from all your prejudices, conditioning and so on, even from your own experience;
Any experience in the present - experience being the reaction of personal desire, which is craving - will yield to you its full significance, if you are watchful, alert.
There can be no intelligence which is the discernment of right value, as long as there is imitation and conformity, as long as there is the search for power and the pursuit of gain.
An experience really understood frees the mind from all search for experience.
Self-discipline implies a mind that is tethered to a particular thought or belief or ideal, a mind that is held by a condition;
When there is complete nakedness, utter hopelessness, then in that moment of vital insecurity there is born the flame of supreme intelligence, the bliss of truth.
Experience becomes valueless to a man who merely uses it as a means of further self-defence against life.
Question: Have you attained to what you are in this life, through a series of past lives?
The mechanistic view of life deprives man of the true experience of reality.
The mind has become merely a record of the various lessons of experience.
The accumulation of self-protective memories is the process of experience, and relationship is the contact between two individualized and self-protective memories, whose morality is the agreement to guard what they possess.
Experience may further condition thought or it may release it from limitations.
Experience based on any belief is limiting, however wide and large it may be.
Mere experience cannot dissolve ignorance; it can only reform it.
As long as we do not understand the motive power of [this] mechanism that creates escape, merely to consider the escapes is of little value.
Unless you understand why you depend upon sensation, upon this constant search for excitement, which becomes vulgar and degrading, you will ever find new forms of excitement, satisfaction.
These talks will be utterly useless if you do not experience as you are listening.
Will your hunger be satisfied through watching another eat?
Only experience keeps the mind-heart pliable and alert but experience is beyond and above intellectual and emotional gratification and stimulation.
The dead past darkens the ever living present.
If we would understand a problem we must set aside our desires, our accumulated experiences, our patterns of thought.
We shall know, as experience, the new form of intelligence only when the self-protective and self-expansive intelligence ceases.
Memory is the residue left in the mind of insufficient experience;
We experience through the screen of the past and therefore there is no experience at all but only a modification of experience.
[Experience] is always broken down to constitute a particular condition and therefore, there is never a complete action.
In seeing the false as false, truth is perceived.
If you experience something directly, it would be experience not based on belief;
Experience is only to the man who is asleep because he is awakened by that experience and he then says that he has had experience.
To understand a challenge, which is always new, I must also meet it anew, there must be no residue of yesterday; so, I must say adieu to yesterday.
I must give continuity to an experience, otherwise consciousness ceases.
If you have a very strong feeling of nationalism, what happens? You give it a name, the thought arises of idealism, love, 'my country; that is, you term it and thereby give it a continuity.
And now you will say 'I have learned a very good trick. I know how to deal with unpleasant feelings, how to make them come to an end quickly: I won't term them'
You may have understood the verbal expressions of what I have explained, but the living significance, the inward meaning, you will understand only through experimentation.
Consciousness is action; and without challenge, response, without experiencing, naming or terming, and recording, which is memory, there is no action