Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Madras, India | Group Discussion 25th October, 1947

Relationship is a living thing and as a living thing it is self-revealing. Yet, as we base it on our beliefs and conclusions, it ceases to be 'living' and becomes a problem. You cannot have vested interests - economic, psychological or spiritual - and at the same time freedom. Awareness of our 'conditioning' or 'blockages' will lead to a sea of troubles. "My son, if you come to serve God, come prepared for temptation". Those who are pursuing Truth will have to meet troubles; it is they who are going to change the world.

Tags: learning, relationship

Related Quotes
Love does not compare, and so the envy and torture of 'becoming' cease.
Let the thing that you are watching tell its story, rather than you tell it what it should be.
To look very carefully you have to pay attention, you have to listen - if you are interested - listen and find out the art of listening, the art of seeing, the art of learning.
To understand anything rather deeply, one must approach the issue simply - that is, not verbally or emotionally merely, but rather with a mind that is very young.
By adding little by little to the granary in the mind, you hope to become full, and to be able to meet life fully, wholly.
Learning is an active-present of the word, not the past-present.
You are not listening, you are not learning, but accomodating, adjusting to what is being said.
If we do not think in terms of continuity, there will be an ending, there will be dying, and we would see things clearly, as simple as they are, directly.
When we look to life as a school in which to learn, in which to grow, then we are dependent upon that self-consciousness
Life is not a thing from which you learn, it is meant to be lived - to be lived supremely, intelligently, divinely.
Relationship is a process of self-discovery, in which there is wider and deeper understanding; relationship is a constant adjustment in self-discovery.
Condemnation, judgment and comparison do not bring the experience of understanding; on the contrary they will stop experience
When there is, on the part of one, the attitude of learning, and, on the part of the other, the attitude of teaching, communion really ceases;
A man who is merely teaching is not living any more than a man who is merely listening
We are used to being told or being directed; as such, I become the teacher, and you become the learner, which is really absurd.
Question: Learning and studying, is it thinking process or something different?
You have an image, an idea, a conclusion about yourself: that you are spiritual, that you are the Atman, that you are the soul or whatever it is.
When you lose your relationship with nature and the vast heavens, you lose your relationship with man.
There was complete emptiness of the brain, and the mind was free of all experience, the knowing of yesterday, though a thousand yesterdays have been.
If relationship is based on mere usage, is there any relationship, except the most superficial, between the user and the used?
You have only one head, care for it, don't destroy it. It's so easy to poison it.
Relationship is merely a stimulation, a distraction, as long as we are using another as a means of self-gratification or as a necessity in order to escape from ourselves.
One has to be aware, extremely alert, to see whether one is merely living according to an ideal, principle, or standard, which indicates the lack of real understanding of the present, and an escape from actuality.
It is only in a state of resistance that there can be this consciousness of relationship, which is merely an adjustment between opposing conflicts.
How can there be true relationship between two individualized patterns, though there may be mechanical response from each?
Is not all existence a question of relationship?
Not finding satisfaction in human relationship we often try to establish it in the realm of theories, beliefs, concepts.
Relationship is now based on dependence, that is, one depends on another for one's psychological satisfaction, happiness and well-being.
Life cannot be without relationship, but we have made it so agonizing and hideous by basing it on personal and possessive love.
If we can but realize that it is not how another acts that is of primary importance, but how each one of us acts and reacts and if that reaction and action can be fundamentally, deeply understood, then relationship will undergo a deep and radical change.
Self-revelation is only possible in relationship.
Without fully understanding the process of greed, merely to cultivate kindliness, generosity, is to perpetuate ignorance and cruelty; without integrally understanding relationship, merely to cultivate compassion, forgiveness, is to bring about self-isolation and to indulge in subtle forms of pride.
There is conflict in relationship, but instead of understanding its cause and so transcending it, we try to escape from it and seek gratification elsewhere.
There can never be self-isolation, however much one may crave for it; relationship is ever continuous; to be is to be related.
Conflicts in relationship build a wall of continuous resistance and instead of bringing wider and deeper unity create insurmountable differences and disunity.
To be is to be related; there is no such thing as isolated being.
Is not relationship a mirror in which, if we are aware, we can observe without distortion our private thoughts and motives, our inward state?
Though the right produces religion, worship, etc., yet if you look at it very deeply, you will see that ultimately it denies man's happiness because it produces wars, regimentation and an education that merely shows you what to think, not how to think; yet surely the organized society of the left also denies man's happiness because it is regimented.
"Transform society" is one of our catch-phrases, an easy assertion, that we must do something about the world as though the world were so different from ourselves.
How can we go far unless we understand what is near, the near being our relationship with ourselves and our neighbour, with family, etc.
The relationship of two people creates society; society is not independent of you and me;
We talk about love, we talk about responsibility, duty, but there is really no love, and relationship is based on gratification, the effect of which we see in the present civilization.
We want to bring about alteration through a system or through a revolution in ideas or values, based on a system, forgetting that it is you and I who create society, who bring about confusion or order by the way in which we live.
Without love, relationship is a pain; however gratifying, or however superficial, it leads to boredom, to routine, to habit with all its implications.
If I try to fulfil myself through things, through family, through ideas, then family, names, things and ideas become very important.
There is real thinking only when there is no response to memory.
True revolution can take place only when you, the individual, become aware in your relationship to another.
Society is the product of relationship, of yours and mine together.
To be, is to be related;