Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Early Writings, Volume VII | Talks at the Ojai Camp 1932

Question: When I think of the Christ I feel immense love in my heart. When I am in your presence, I am mentally stimulated. I know this is also the experience of others. Why do we feel this difference if, as you say, thought and love are the same?

Krishnamurti: Because you are dividing life into emotion and thought. If you are looking for comfort, you will have it; if you are looking for stimulation, you will be stimulated. The fullness of life is neither comfort nor stimulation, but the perfect harmony of thought and emotion.

When I am talking to you, I am feeling intensely. Thinking and feeling are to me the same, because I have lost the distinction of what you call thought and emotion. To lose that distinction, you must first become aware of it in yourself, you must know for yourself that you think apart from feeling; that is, you must be fully self-conscious. In that flame of self-consciousness there is utter aloneness, and when you know that solitude, which is an ecstasy, then thought and feeling are beginning to lose their distinction. Though you reflect, that reflection is an emotional awareness; though you feel, it is a mental awareness. Then thought is ever an awareness.

Man in himself is life, and he cannot find it through another. He can realize it through piercing the many layers of his own self-consciousness. All following and looking to another is unnatural. You must penetrate your own mind and heart to realize the ecstasy of life, and you cannot ultimately escape from that effort. There is always escape when you are not free from craving, and no one can deliver it from you except yourself, through your own delight, through your own search. When all craving has ceased, then to think is to feel, there is no distinction between mind and heart. There is then an intense awareness, a concentration which has lost all distinction. It is the concentration of a flower. That concentration is infinite; but what you call love and thought breed resistance, bondage, laziness of mind and heart, and therefore corruption.

Tags: distinction, emotion, thought

Related Quotes
when thought, which is emotion, which is action itself, is unimpeded in its movement, is not compelled or influenced or bound by an idea, and does not proceed from the background of tradition or habit, then that movement is creative.
True search can begin only when we do not separate mind from emotion.
If what I am saying acts merely as a stimulation, then there arises the question of how to apply it to your daily life with its pains and conflicts.
Desire is not emotion; desire is the result of a mind that is ever seeking satisfaction, whose values are based on satisfaction.
Only in deep emotion is there no craving for satisfaction.
Desire and emotion are two different and distinct processes; desire being entirely of the mind, and emotion the integral expression of one's whole being.
A mind-heart that is burdened with the memory of yesterday cannot live in the eternal present.
What is awareness? There is objective awareness. Then, there is the emotional response to each other or to truth.
There is only thinking, and thinking is impermanent
There is no such thing as pure thought, or ''free'' thought
We must find out - if it is possible or not - whether there is a different dimension, a different approach, to life altogether.
Thinking is materialistic, it is a process of matter.
Most of us want to be occupied; otherwise we shall feel lost, otherwise we do not know what to do, we will be lonely, we will be confronted with what we actually are
What is the relationship of attention to inattention, and to awareness?
Only the mind that has emptied itself of the known is creative.
Thought is the very denial of love, and it cannot enter into that space where the me is not.
Self-knowledge is only from moment to moment, and therefore there is a creative happiness from moment to moment.
You have only one head, care for it, don't destroy it. It's so easy to poison it.
An intelligent mind acts in the field of thought intelligently, sanely, without resistance;
To walk alone, unimpeded by thought, by the trail of our desires, is to go beyond the reaches of the mind.
Can thought be aware of its own movement? Can thought see itself, see what it is doing, both in the outer and the inner?
It is odd what importance we give to the printed word, to so-called sacred books.
To transform, I must look at what is; and I am not looking at it as long as I have an ideal.
Sir, don't follow any authority. Authority is evil. Authority destroys, authority perverts, authority corrupts;
As long as you think time and thought are necessary, in the psychological world, in the world of the self, in the world of psyche, in the world of inside the skin, then you will be perpetually in fear.
In the life we we generally lead there is very little solitude.
If you have no thoughts, there is no thinker; so it is thought that creates the thinker.
The thinker is a fictitious entity, an unreal state. There is only thought; and the bundle of thoughts creates the 'I', the thinker.
Is there any thought which is not conditioned?
Experiencing without memory is one state, and experiencing with memory is another.
The thinker is the thought. They are not separate, they are a joint phenomenon and not separate processes.
Thought is the outcome of incomplete experience.
A fundamental question cannot be answered by somebody else.
Thought is a very strange thing, is it not?
Thought is like the waters of a river. It must be in continual movement. Eternity is that movement.
when thought, which is emotion, which is action itself, is unimpeded in its movement, is not compelled or influenced or bound by an idea, and does not proceed from the background of tradition or habit, then that movement is creative.
What do I mean by right thinking?
Our daily thought and action are controlled by the past, by the concealed motives, memories, and hidden cravings.
Love transcends the friend and the enemy.
If you would understand something do you compare it with something else or do you study it for itself?
The complete integration of the thinker with his thought cannot be experienced if there is no understanding of the process of becoming and the conflict of opposites.
Is not the maker of the problem more important than the problem itself?
Is the thinker different from his thought?
In right meditation the concentrator is the concentration; as generally practised the thinker is the concentrator, concentrating upon something or becoming something.
Our thought is conditioned by the past; the I, the me and the mine, is the result of stored up experience, ever incomplete.
How is thought which has become the means of self-expansion to act without giving sustenance to the ego, the cause of conflict and sorrow?
How can thought which is the outcome of time, of self-protective activity, comprehend that which is not of time?
If you have the capacity to allow thought to unroll itself fully then you will perceive that one thought contains, or is related to, all thought.
What is known is not the Real.
How can the mind which is restless and going swiftly backwards and forwards, be aware of its activities?
As long as the mind is moving from the known to the known, it is 'dead', and a 'dead' thing cannot understand anything.
Continuity implied through a belief or through the soul is the product of thought and therefore it is the result of the known, because thought can only think of something which it knows
When we are thinking about something beyond, it is also the process of the mind and therefore it is unreal.
Thought is always moving from the known to the known, from memory to memory, from continuity to continuity, and it cannot think of the unknown.