Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Flight of the Eagle | London 4th Public Talk 23rd March 1969

What happens when the`thinker' sees that he is the thought - which he is - that the experiencer' is the experience? Then what is one to do? Are you following the question? The thinker is the thought and thought wanders off; then the thinker, thinking he is separate, says, `I must control it.' Is the thinker different from the thing called thought? If there is no thought, is there a thinker?

What takes place when the thinker sees he is the thought What actually takes place when the `thinker' is the thought as the `observer' is the observed? What takes place? In that there is no separation, no division and therefore no conflict therefore thought is no longer to be controlled, shaped; then what takes place? Is there then any wandering of thought at all? Before, there was control of thought, there was concentration of thought, there was the conflict between the `thinker' who wanted to control thought, and thought wandering off. That goes on all the time with all of us. Then there is the sudden realization that the `thinker' is the thought - a realization, not a verbal statement, but an actuality. Then what takes place? Is there such a thing as thought wandering? It is only when the `observer' is different from thought that he censors it; then he can say, `This is right or this is wrong thought,' or `Thought is wandering away I must control it,` But when the thinker realizes that he is the thought, is there a wandering at all? Go into it, sirs, don't accept it, you will see it for yourself. It is only when there is a resistance that there is conflict; the resistance is created by the thinker who thinks he is separate from the thought; but when the thinker realizes that he is the thought, there is no resistance - which does not mean that thought goes all over the place and does what it likes, on the contrary.

The whole concept of control and concentration undergoes a tremendous change; it becomes attention, something entirely different.

Tags: concentration, control, the observer and the observed

Related Quotes
a mind that has the power of concentration, that says it has complete control over thought, is a stupid mind.
You are forcing your mind to fix itself on an idea which is not born of innate and vital interest, because if it were, there would be no conflict, you would concentrate spontaneously and without effort.
You can create noble fixations and wholly be absorbed in them but this does not bring about understanding.
Concentration is brought about through effort, compulsion, direction, imitation, and so concentration is a process of exclusion.
Concentration is not meditation, because where there is interest it is comparatively easy to concentrate on something.
The essence of control is suppression.
Meditation, along that quiet and deserted road came like a soft rain over the hills; it came as easily and naturally as the coming night.
Let the thing that you are watching tell its story, rather than you tell it what it should be.
Sir, don't follow any authority. Authority is evil. Authority destroys, authority perverts, authority corrupts;
Freedom is born of the perception that freedom is essential.
We all need a quiet mind, a peaceful mind, an absolutely silent mind without a murmur of thought. Is that possible? Possible means we don't know.
The energy which seeks truth creates its own discipline without any form of imposition; and as the river finds the sea, so that energy finds its own freedom.
Life is a battle of ideas, a battle of influences, and your mind is the field of the battle.
To control thought-feeling for a greater reward, for a greater result, is to make it petty, ignorant and sorrowful.
If I have the whole picture in mind then I can take in the detail; but if my mind only operates in a detail then I cannot take in the whole.
I feel that a radical change can come only when there is no effort, when the mind is not trying to become something, not trying to be virtuous - which does not mean that the mind must be nonvirtuous.
What you call intuition is merely the unfettered fulfillment of your own secret hopes and desires.
To control, to possess, we have certain laws which we call moral.
I have tried to explain that conduct born of compulsion, whether it be the compulsion of reward or of punishment, of fear or of love, is not right conduct.
What we are trying to do here is to understand the process of desire, not to put a boundary to craving.
I am talking of understanding which transcends reason and emotion.
The motive for cultivating the opposite matters greatly; if it is a desire to escape from the struggle and pain of envy, then its opposite becomes identical with itself and so there is no freedom from envy.
In awareness there is only the present, that is, being aware, you see the past process of influence which controls the present and modifies the future.
When there is a natural concentration of interest, not mere control, you begin to discover that thought is in a process of constant imitation and that it is ever wandering through its many layers of memories, precepts, examples;
The purpose of these talks has been, not to give a system of thought, but to help each one of us to become aware of ourselves, of our daily action and relationship, and thus naturally discern our prejudices, fears, cravings;
Awareness is not mere analysis or self-examination.
All overcoming is never transcending, for that which is overcome, only takes another form.
If thought becomes aware of itself, it will perceive that it goes from one superficial interest to another, and merely to withdraw from one and try to concentrate on another does not lead to understanding and love.
Control of thought does not bring about right thinking;
You can create noble fixations and wholly be absorbed in them but this does not bring about understanding.
Freedom from the opposites is only possible when thought-feeling is able to observe without acceptance, denial or comparison its actions and responses;
I wonder how many of you have really practised meditation? If you have, you will have noticed how difficult it is to be extensively aware without the narrowing down of thought-feeling.
You may succeed in forcibly stilling the mind, but what is the outcome of such effort? Death, is it not?
Any suppression or control whether right or wrong, is based on a pattern of behaviour; the mind, being thus controlled, is not free.
As practiced by most of us, meditation is an effort to do something of which you have already an outline, thus forcing the mind along a pre-determined channel.
The purpose of meditation is to discover reality, not to hypnotize yourself about the reality.
Before thought can be controlled, whatever that may mean, we must understand the process of thinking and who it is that thinks, and find out whether these are two separate processes, or one unitary process.
Therefore, we are free of the idea of discipline, of the idea of control - which is an extraordinary revolution, isn't it?
A controlled mind is not a free mind.
Why do we give such deep significance and meaning to the unconscious? - for after all, it is as trivial as the conscious.