How important do you consider group dialogue to be in understanding the more subtle points of Krishnamurti's message?

It is better to share our life problems individually as it is not good and possible in discussing the "K"'s teaching and debating of the same.

His teaching is very unique in nature....which has to be realied individually....

This is the very basic requirement to understand "K" very well and continue our life learning journey without any confusion.

Do you think it advisable to introduce Krishnamurti to people you know? Have you ever done it and if yes, what are your experiences?

It is not so....as I know and selected "K" based one's feeling. It is difficult to recommend "K" and his teaching.

If anybody suffered in life more and it is easy to understand his teaching and beyond the teaching.

One is not interested to introduce "K" as "K" also insisted not to follow me or make me your guru.................

However I am forwarding his nice...short piece to all of my friends without mentioning his name.

Can dialogue - in the sense of sincere inquiry - be organized or can it only come about spontaneously, unprompted?

Reality or deep feeling or sensitivity has to come from Inner not thorugh debate or dialogue.

Krishnamurti once said you must begin with doubt, but that doubt must be kept on a leash. How do you find the proper balance between doubt and a "positive disposition" in investigating his proposals, so as to neither tie yourself up in knots, nor to blindly believe?

Take for example when two persons are debating about light who never seen it in their life - its nature/color/its existence/appearance and much more.

Suppose infront of them suddenly light appears......then there is no need for debate or opinion or judgement or acceptance or refusal....it is there....whether they want or not.

So I feel it is correct to doubt everything around us excluding natural things not made by mind.

Do you ever feel that you have been conditioned by Krishnamurti's teachings?

Not conditioned, but liberated from the clouded mind of belief/rituals/puja or reading scriptures/Upansids and much more spiritual books.

My mind is free no body can influence me of any belief.

Whatever "K" talked is ONLY about FACTS. With the facts, we can't say that we have been conditioned by "K"

However I feel, we should realise individually with his teaching/facts and proceed in our own way and bring the new thing from us like he brought without depend on anybody.

But I really very happy of my liberation from all kind of beliefs only because of "K"

Does the phrase "living the teachings" have any meaning to you?

yes..however without copying or imitating him...

What future do you foresee for Krishnamurti's works? Do you think they will grow in importance or will they just gradually die away?

It is not related to time at all. It is related to realization of facts.

Once you realise it, then it is timeless...

Are there any aspects of Krishnamurti's teaching that you find implausible or difficult to accept?

As I am repeatedly saying...without seeing the light we are debating and arguing...suddenly infront of us light is there...

Light is there whether you or me accept or not accept. It doen't matter...it is there for us to realise the light

How do you personally go about exploring the Krishnamurti's teachings (through personal study, dialogues, dvds)?

I am keep on saying it is very very difficult to debate or discuss about "K' teachings. It has to come from inner level of individually.

Again it is based on our suffering..suppose one is very rich then there is no need for him to talk about "K"

As per me, for the one who suffered more in life who can understand "K" teachings and facts behind his words very clearly.

And also when you are not realising the facts only you can debate. Otherwise no need for debate.

Do you think Krishnamurti was exceptional, or is the transformation he spoke of universally accessible?

Very true...........I dont find anyone like him talked about humanity without religious approach.

Sir, please understand if you love humanity irrespective of race/caste/religion then it is very easy understand and realise the facts.

If we have divisions, then we can keep on debate or discuss about everyone's teaching in our life time and waste our energy

Do you think it is possible to make Krishnamurti more "practicable" than what he himself seems to have allowed for?

It depends on individual. it is very difficult to express in words

Has coming into contact with Krishnamurti and his teachings had any perceptible effect on your life and/or relationships?

He freed my clouded mind from so called religious rituals/ puja and much more.

However I dont like to force others to follow like that..

Repeatedly saying it is individual matter of realising the teaching of "K"

If you had to sum up what Krishnamurti is all about in just a few words of your own, what would they be?

He is really a TRUE HUMAN WITH LOVE FOR ALL.