Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Jack Pine - Personal Profile

Jack Pine
Jack Pine
United States
Member since: Wed, 24 Aug 2011, 4:07pm
Last visited 13 hours ago

Interview Answers

Jack Pine has not answered any interview questions yet.

Recent Activity

Wednesday, 25 November, 2015

Sunday, 22 November, 2015

Saturday, 21 November, 2015

Friday, 20 November, 2015

Thursday, 19 November, 2015

Wednesday, 18 November, 2015

Tuesday, 17 November, 2015

Monday, 16 November, 2015


steve ss (account deleted) wrote:
Fri, 23 Oct 2015, 5:46pm

For whatever it is worth, thanks Jack, for showing some humanity and conscience. Feel free to delete this, but wanted to thank you, you touched me a little with your post of understanding and compassion. I would only hope others might join in and show some mercy and compassion and understanding. "To understand all, is to forgive all."

John P (account deleted) wrote:
Sat, 24 Oct 2015, 9:43am

Hi brainless!

Pavill says it's me who's leaving all the messages and that, as per usual, is good enough for you, right? I'm sure if he told you to jump in the canal you'd be in there.

K derided what he called 'government scientists' but applauded free-thinking scientists of the like of Rupert Sheldrake and Bohm. The difference is between, on the one hand 'knowledge' (which is what 'government scientists' work from, ie. the trammeled 'knowledge' laid down previously and on which they purport to build), and 'dynamic rationality'. K's teachings come out in stark favour of 'dynamic rationality'. The author of the 'Woobusters' thread derides this with the pejorative term 'woo' and himself comes out starkly in favour of knowledge. The lunatic Singh excludes supporters of the teachings in this matter and upholds Pavil's alternative. You - brainless - can't see the wood for the trees.

steve ss (account deleted) wrote:
Sat, 24 Oct 2015, 10:54am

Sorry to bother you again Jack, but would you be kind enough to campaign to bring back both John and me to the general forum.

As you can see, we both have separate accounts again and are two different people, two different voices.

My whole main objection and the reason i am doing what i am doing, is that i feel that our voices should be welcomed here just as much as yours, Bobbys, Pavils, Jeans, etc. Why exclude some and include these others. What makes our voices so unwelcomed here? If some have a problem with what we have to say, they can always ignore us or not respond to us. But in reality, i feel we have as much right to be here as the next person.

I can be wrong, but i think your conscience was touched and opened up some and was realizing you were too hard on us and you never know what others are going through. I was so proud of you when that spark opened up and i am hoping it stays lighted. Thanks, Steve.

steve ss (account deleted) wrote:
Sat, 24 Oct 2015, 6:11pm

I am done with you, Jack. Take care, be well, bye.