Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

Ojai, California | Fourth Talk in The Oak Grove, 1934

As I said, liberation is not an end, it is not a goal: it is the understanding of right values, eternal values. Intelligence is ever becoming, it has no end, no finality. In the desire to attain there is subtle craving for self-continuance, glorified self-continuance; and every struggle, every effort to attain liberation indicates an escape from the present. This summation of intelligence, which is liberation, is not to be understood through effort. After all, you make an effort when you want, when you desire to acquire something. But liberation is not to be acquired, truth is not to be acquired. So where there is a craving for liberation, for a culmination, for attainment, there must be an effort to sustain, to preserve, to perpetuate that consciousness which we call the 'I'. The very essence of that 'I' is an effort to reach a culmination, because it lives in a series of movements of memory, moving towards an end.

Liberation is not to be ''regarded'' in any way. It is born. It comes into being only when the mind is not trying to escape from the condition in which it is caught, but rather to understand the significance of that condition which creates conflict. You see, as you don't understand the condition, the environment which creates conflict, you seek an idea, a culmination, an end, a goal, saying to yourself, ''If I understand that, this will disappear,'' or, ''If I have that, I can impose that on this condition.'' So it is but a subtle form of continual escape from the present. All ideals, beliefs, goals and culminations are but ways out of the present. Whereas if you really come to think of it, the more you are pursuing an end, a goal, an aim, a belief, an ideal, the more you are burdening the future, because you are escaping from the present and therefore creating more and more limitation, conflict, sorrow.

Tags: continuity, liberation

Related Quotes
Imitation is a form of stealing: you are nothing but he is somebody, so you are going to get some of his glory by copying him.
Is death merely the ending of the physical organism? Is that what we are afraid of? Is it the body that we want to continue? Or is it some other form of continuance that we crave?
It is a stupid person that wants to continue - no man who understood the rich feelings of life would want continuity.
You see, death is destruction, it is final; you can't argue with it, you can't say, 'Nay, wait a few days more.'
Do we know what love is? Never knowing it is the wonder of it, the beauty of it.
One sees that life has an ending, a sudden ending, what lived yesterday may not live today, and what lives today may not live tomorrow.
Immortality is not egotistic continuance at all.
Consciousness is composed of many layers of memories, which come into being, or remain present, where there is ignorance, craving, want.
The thing that the mind clings to as the permanent is in its very essence the transient.
We are not concerned with physical continuity. What we are primarily concerned about is whether through things there is psychological continuity;
Surely death is as lovely as the real is, because both are the unknown, but a mind that is merely functioning within the known can never understand the unknown.
The 'I' is non-existent without memory, its tendencies, gifts and so on, i.e. non-existent without continuity, the racial, the traditional, the past in conjunction with the now, the past flowing through the present to the future which is hope.
Why does the mind separate itself from the stream of continuity and say 'I remember'?
If we really go into it, if we are aware of its significance, we will find that, that which is spiritual is timeless and therefore beyond our reach and therefore beyond continuity;
When you treat impermanency as impermanent then there is nothing; but when you are seeking permanency as an opposite to transitory, the permanency itself is transitory.
That which is spirituality, truth, godliness, is beyond time; therefore it is not the continuity we know of as tomorrow and the future.
There is no renewal through memory, through continuity - there is renewal only when there is an ending, there is freshness only when there is a death, when idea ceases.
To be free from the background, from the conditioning influences, from memory, there must be freedom from continuity; and, there is continuity as long as thought and feeling are not ended completely.
Surely, change is a modified continuity, I am this, and I want to become that; that is, I want to become the opposite of what I am.
If you have a very strong feeling of nationalism, what happens? You give it a name, the thought arises of idealism, love, 'my country; that is, you term it and thereby give it a continuity.
And now you will say 'I have learned a very good trick. I know how to deal with unpleasant feelings, how to make them come to an end quickly: I won't term them'
You may have understood the verbal expressions of what I have explained, but the living significance, the inward meaning, you will understand only through experimentation.
So, I want to know if the 'I' continues. The 'I', which is a total process, a psychological as well as physiological process, which is with the body and also apart from the body - I want to know if that 'I' continues, if it comes into being after this physical existence ends