Krishnamurti & the Art of Awakening

Krishnamurti Quote of the Day

The Network of Thought | Chapter 9

Man has always sought something beyond the physical existence. He has always searched, asked, suffered, tortured himself, to find out if there is something which is not of time, which is not of thought, which is not belief or faith. To find that out one must be absolutely free, for if you are anchored to a particular form of belief, that very belief will prevent investigation into what is eternal - if there is such a thing as eternity which is beyond all time, beyond all measure. So one must be free - if one is serious in the enquiry into what religion is - one must be free of all the things that thought has invented about that which is considered religious. That is, all the things that Hinduism, for example, has invented, with its superstitions, with its beliefs, with its images, and its ancient literature such as the Upanishads - one must he completely free of all that. If one is attached to all that then it is impossible, naturally, to discover that which is original. You understand the problem? If my mind, my brain is conditioned by Hindu superstitions, beliefs, dogmas and idolatry, with all the ancient tradition, then it is anchored to that and cannot move, it is not free.

Similarly, one must be free totally from all the inventions of thought, the rituals, dogmas, beliefs, symbols, saviours and so on of Christianity. That may be rather more difficult, that is coming nearer home. But all religions, whether Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, are the movement of thought continued through time, through literature, through symbols, through things made by the hand or by the mind - and all that is considered religious in the modern world. To the speaker that is not religious. To the speaker it is a form of illusion, comforting, satisfying, romantic, sentimental but not actual.

Tags: god, religion

Related Quotes
It is odd what importance we give to the printed word, to so-called sacred books.
The religious mind is really a scientific mind - scientific in the sense that it is able to observe facts without distortion, to see itself as it is.
Anyone who tries to imagine what God is, what truth is, is but seeking an escape, a shelter from the daily routine of conflict.
Why do we try to find out if there is a God ...? Is it not because we feel the insufficiency of living?
Question: Is there God?
Question: Do you believe in God?
If anyone were to describe reality, it would no longer be real.
To speculate and intellectually draw conclusions as to whether God exists or not has to me no deep significance.
To us, God is the ultimate continuance and Death the ultimate denial of continuance.
We do not know what God is, what Death is, and what Love is.
God is something extraordinary and immeasurable; and it is fantastic to say that he speaks through somebody or is interested in any particular person.
Religion as it exists is not religion at all.
Religion, surely, is the uncovering of reality. Religion is not belief.
Religion, surely, is the uncovering of reality. Religion is not belief. Religion is not the search for truth.
Religion as it exists is not religion at all.
Breaking through is not a matter of time.
The worship of authority, whether in big or little things, is evil, the more so in religious matters.
You see man imprisoned by innumerable walls, walls of religion, of social, political and national limitations, walls created by his own ambitions, aspirations, fears, hopes, security, prejudices, hate and love.
From my point of view, religions with all their intermediaries, their ceremonies, their priests, destroy creative understanding and pervert judgment.
Self-knowledge is not a conclusion, an end; it has no beginning and no end.
Truth is truth, one, alone; it has no sides, no paths; all paths do not lead to truth.
Mere reformation of the pattern of society only alters the surface, it brings about a more respectable form of ambition.
For me, revolution is synonymous with religion. I do not mean by the word 'revolution' immediate economic or social change; I mean a revolution in consciousness itself.
The religious mind is really a scientific mind - scientific in the sense that it is able to observe facts without distortion, to see itself as it is.
The whole idea of following a discipline makes the mind and heart rigid and consistent.
The so-called religions give the pattern of conformity to the mind that is seeking security born of fear, in search of comfort;
Our religions throughout the world keep people apart.
The people who believe so much in God are really not in love with life.
To me religion is the false result of a false cause, the cause being conflict, and religion merely a means of escape from that conflict.
As in a circus the animals are trained to function for the amusement of spectators, so the individual through fear seeks out these spiritual trainers whom he calls priests and swamis, who are the defenders of spurious spirituality and the inanities of religion.
An authority seasoned through the mists of time becomes invulnerable, and then man accepts that authority as being final.
Curiously, if you consider it, religion which should denounce war, helps its furtherance.
The system which you call religion and which has been created through your own demand for security has become so powerful, so realistic, that very few free themselves from its weight of crushing tradition and authority.
If wisdom could be acquired through a religious society or sect, we should all be wise, for we have had religions with us for thousands of years.
Religions, with their beliefs, dogmas and creeds, have become tremendous barriers between human beings, dividing man against man, limiting him and destroying his intelligence.
Question: What do you mean by "religion"?
Religion, to most people, is nothing but a reaction against intelligence.
The constant conformity to a particular mould is the basis of our religious thought and moral action;
For me, all religions are but defensive reactions against life, against intelligence.
Organised religion has never said that ambition is evil, but has always decried sex. Don't you see the implications?
Any positive approach to the unknown will make the unknown knowable and therefore that is not the Truth.